Make Executive Agreements the President: A Comprehensive Guide

As the leader of the free world, the President of the United States is tasked with making and enforcing laws, directing foreign policy, and representing the country on the global stage. One of the ways the president carries out these duties is through the use of executive agreements.

Executive agreements are a type of international agreement that does not require the approval of the Senate, unlike treaties, which require a two-thirds majority vote. Executive agreements can be used to negotiate a wide range of topics, including trade, military alliances, and environmental protection.

Here`s what you need to know about executive agreements and how they are used by the president:

1. Executive agreements are based on the president`s constitutional authority

The power to negotiate executive agreements is derived from the president`s constitutional authority to conduct foreign relations. The Supreme Court has upheld this authority, stating that it is within the president`s power to enter into agreements with foreign governments without the approval of Congress.

2. Executive agreements have advantages over treaties

The advantage of an executive agreement over a treaty is that it can be negotiated and implemented more quickly. Treaties require the approval of the Senate, which can be a lengthy process. Additionally, executive agreements do not have the same legal status as treaties and are therefore not as binding. This can be a benefit in situations where the agreement needs to be updated or changed quickly.

3. Executive agreements can be controversial

Due to their relative ease of negotiation and implementation, executive agreements can be a subject of controversy. Critics argue that executive agreements circumvent the constitutional process and give too much power to the president. Additionally, some argue that executive agreements should be subject to approval by Congress or a public vote.

4. Executive agreements have been used by presidents of both parties

Executive agreements have been used by presidents of both parties throughout history. President Franklin D. Roosevelt used executive agreements extensively to negotiate with foreign powers during World War II. President Obama used executive agreements to secure a climate agreement with China and to negotiate the Iran nuclear deal. President Trump also relied heavily on executive agreements, particularly on issues related to immigration and trade.

5. Executive agreements are subject to legal challenges

Like any agreement, executive agreements can be subject to legal challenges. The Supreme Court has ruled that executive agreements cannot override existing federal law, and Congress can pass legislation to override an executive agreement. Additionally, executive agreements can be challenged based on the Constitution`s separation of powers clause.

In conclusion, executive agreements are an important tool in the president`s foreign policy toolbox. They allow the president to negotiate and implement international agreements quickly and efficiently. However, they can also be controversial and subject to legal challenges. As with any aspect of presidential power, the use of executive agreements will continue to be debated and evolve over time.